What 502 mobile game developers in the US and UK think about reward-based UA, and why most of them are doubling down.
What's inside
How developers rate today's UA environment and where they plan to spend
How rewarded campaigns perform against other UA channels
What's holding non-adopters back, from fraud concerns to internal resources
Where reward-based UA is heading next
Reward-based UA has left its incentivized-traffic reputation behind. 94% of developers now feel positive about it, and 77% have already run a rewarded campaign. Part One of Rewarded Returns asks 502 mobile game developers how rewarded campaigns perform, what holds non-adopters back, and where the channel goes next.
have already run a reward-based UA campaign
77%
say rewarded campaigns outperformed their other UA
82%
say rewarded UA has given them a competitive edge
95%
The 82% and 95% come from developers who have run a rewarded campaign. A small footnote would help here.
Developers who have tried rewarded UA see results. When asked how their rewarded campaigns compared with other UA, 82% said they performed better, and almost a third said much better. Only 2% found them less effective.

Retention is a big part of that. 79% say users from rewarded campaigns retain better than users from non-rewarded sources, and 59% planned to expand their rewarded campaigns in 2025. Among developers who hadn't run one yet, 62% worried about falling behind competitors, and 43% planned to add rewarded UA to their 2025 strategy.
Download report
The full report also covers the biggest UA challenges developers face, how they rate rewarded platforms on support and fraud prevention, and an early look at what gamers think.














